NJ Domestic Violence Charges & Penalties | Law Offices of SRIS, P.C.

Navigating Domestic Violence Charges in New Jersey: A Veteran Attorney’s Perspective
Key Takeaways
- Two-Track System: Domestic violence matters in New Jersey proceed on two separate and parallel tracks: a criminal charge for the underlying act (like assault) and a civil action for a Restraining Order under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act.
- Restraining Orders Have Serious Consequences: A Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) can be issued based on one side of the story and immediately remove you from your home. A Final Restraining Order (FRO) is permanent, has lifetime implications, and can impact custody, employment, and your right to own firearms.
- Predicate Acts Are Key: To get a restraining order, the plaintiff must prove a “predicate act” of domestic violence occurred—one of 19 specific criminal offenses listed in the statute, such as harassment, assault, or terroristic threats.
- Violation is a Separate Crime: Violating any provision of a TRO or FRO is a criminal offense known as Contempt (N.J.S.A. 2C:29-9), which can lead to your immediate arrest, new criminal charges, and potential jail time.
- Experienced Counsel is Crucial: The stakes are incredibly high in both the criminal and civil proceedings. The expedited nature of restraining order hearings (typically within 10 days) leaves no room for error. Navigating this complex legal landscape requires immediate and seasoned legal guidance.
Table of Contents
- Understanding the Dual Threat of a Domestic Violence Accusation
- The Grave Consequences: More Than Just a Piece of Paper
- The Legal Gauntlet: From TRO to Final Hearing
- The SRIS Domestic Violence Case Strategy Organizer
- Strategic Defense: How We Fight These Allegations
- Critical Mistakes to Avoid When Accused
- Glossary of Key New Jersey Domestic Violence Terms
- Common Scenarios We Encounter
- Frequently Asked Questions
1. Understanding the Dual Threat of a Domestic Violence Accusation
When an allegation of domestic violence is made in New Jersey, it triggers a legal firestorm that moves with alarming speed and on two distinct fronts. As a lawyer who has dedicated more than two decades to defending clients in these exact situations, I can tell you that understanding this two-track system is the absolute first step toward protecting yourself. On one track, you have the criminal complaint. This is where the state prosecutes you for an alleged criminal offense—assault, harassment, stalking, or one of the other predicate acts defined by law. This track carries the risk of fines, probation, and even incarceration.
Simultaneously, on a separate but parallel track, the alleged victim can seek a protective order in the Family Part of the Superior Court. This is a civil matter, but its consequences are anything but minor. It begins with a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), often granted ex parte—meaning you are not present to defend yourself. This order can immediately bar you from your home, prevent contact with the plaintiff and your children, and set the stage for a Final Restraining Order (FRO) hearing, which typically occurs within ten days. The speed and severity of this process often leave individuals stunned and at a significant disadvantage from the very beginning. My role is to bring clarity and formidable strategy to both of these battlegrounds, ensuring my client’s rights are vigorously defended at every turn.
2. The Grave Consequences: More Than Just a Piece of Paper
A Final Restraining Order (FRO) in New Jersey is a permanent, life-altering judgment with severe and lasting civil and criminal consequences. It is not merely a directive to stay away; it triggers a cascade of legal disabilities, including immediate forfeiture of firearms rights, inclusion in a statewide domestic violence database, and significant impacts on child custody, employment, and even the ability to travel freely.
In my 20 years of practice, I have seen too many people underestimate the power of a restraining order until it is too late. They treat the initial TRO as a misunderstanding that will simply be cleared up. This is a dangerous miscalculation. The legal framework is established by New Jersey’s Prevention of Domestic Violence Act (N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 et seq.), a statute designed with the specific and powerful intent to protect victims. While this is a noble goal, it results in a system that can be devastating for those who are falsely or unfairly accused.
Let’s be unequivocally clear about the stakes of a Final Restraining Order (FRO):
- Permanent Record: Once an FRO is entered, you are fingerprinted, photographed, and placed into a central domestic violence registry accessible to all law enforcement agencies. This is not a criminal record in the traditional sense, but it functions as a permanent red flag.
- Forfeiture of Firearms Rights: Under both state and federal law, being subject to a final restraining order results in the immediate and permanent prohibition of owning or possessing firearms or ammunition. Your firearms will be seized by law enforcement.
- Impact on Custody and Parenting Time: An FRO creates a presumption that the defendant is a risk to the children. It can be used as a powerful weapon in divorce and custody litigation, potentially leading to supervised visitation or a complete loss of custody.
- Loss of Your Home: The order can grant the plaintiff exclusive possession of a shared residence, regardless of whose name is on the lease or deed. You can be legally barred from your own home.
- Employment and Licensing: Many professional licensing boards and employers conduct background checks. An FRO can prevent you from obtaining or maintaining employment in fields like law enforcement, education, healthcare, and any job requiring a security clearance.
- Financial Penalties: A judge can order you to pay the plaintiff’s legal fees, temporary child and spousal support, and compensation for any losses suffered as a result of the alleged abuse.
- Travel Restrictions: Being on the domestic violence registry can lead to delays and questioning at airports and border crossings.
The criminal charges run parallel to this. A conviction for a predicate act like simple assault (a disorderly persons offense) or terroristic threats (a third-degree crime) carries its own set of penalties, including jail time, fines, and a permanent criminal record that compounds these difficulties. The gravity of this situation cannot be overstated. It is a legal crisis that demands an immediate, experienced response.
3. The Legal Gauntlet: From TRO to Final Hearing
The legal process for a New Jersey restraining order is an accelerated and intense proceeding that begins with an ex parte Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and culminates in a final, trial-like hearing for a Final Restraining Order (FRO) in the Superior Court, Family Part, typically within just ten days. This compressed timeline requires immediate preparation and a deep understanding of the procedural and evidentiary rules.
Understanding the battlefield is paramount. The process is swift and structured, and falling behind at any stage is perilous. Here is the step-by-step breakdown of what you can expect:
- The Inciting Incident and Application: An allegation is made. The alleged victim (the “plaintiff”) goes to the Family Division of the County Superior Court or, after hours, their local police department. They fill out a complaint and speak with a judge (often by phone).
- The Ex Parte TRO Hearing: Based solely on the plaintiff’s version of events, a Municipal Court Judge or Superior Court Judge determines if there is enough evidence to issue a TRO. The legal standard is low. The defendant (you) is not present and has no opportunity to be heard. If the TRO is granted, it is served upon you by a law enforcement officer.
- The Immediate Aftermath of Service: Once served, the TRO is in full effect. You are immediately barred from the locations listed (often your home and workplace) and prohibited from any contact with the plaintiff. Your firearms will be seized. A date for the Final Restraining Order (FRO) hearing is set, usually within 10 days.
- The FRO Hearing: This is the critical event. It is a formal hearing, essentially a trial, before a Superior Court Judge in the Family Part. Both sides have the right to be represented by counsel, to present evidence, to call witnesses, to cross-examine the other party and their witnesses, and to testify on their own behalf. There is no jury; the judge is the sole decider of the facts and the law.
- The Two-Prong Test (Silver v. Silver): To grant a FRO, the judge must find two things by a “preponderance of the evidence” (meaning more likely than not):
- That the defendant committed a “predicate act” of domestic violence as defined in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-19a. The plaintiff must prove one of the 19 listed offenses, such as assault, harassment, stalking, terroristic threats, etc.
- That a restraining order is necessary to protect the plaintiff from future acts of domestic violence. The judge will consider the history between the parties.
- The Judge’s Decision: If the plaintiff fails to prove either prong, the TRO is dismissed, and the case is over. If the plaintiff proves both prongs, the judge will issue a Final Restraining Order (FRO) with all the permanent consequences that entails.
This entire process, from being served with a TRO to a final, life-altering hearing, happens in the blink of an eye. The Superior Court, Family Part is the venue for these hearings, and the judges who preside over them handle these cases daily. They expect a high level of preparation and adherence to court rules. Appearing without an attorney who is intimately familiar with this process is a risk of the highest order.
4. The SRIS Domestic Violence Case Strategy Organizer
In the chaos that follows a domestic violence accusation, organization is your most powerful weapon. The ten-day window between a TRO and an FRO hearing is unforgiving. To empower our clients and build the strongest possible defense, we immediately implement The SRIS Domestic Violence Case Strategy Organizer. This is not just a form; it is a structured, step-by-step process we guide you through to marshal the facts, identify evidence, and prepare for testimony. It is a critical tool for transforming a jumble of events and emotions into a clear, coherent, and defensible case narrative.
Step 1: Deconstruct the Plaintiff’s Allegations
- List Each Accusation: Write down every single act the plaintiff has alleged in the TRO complaint. Use their exact words if possible.
- Date and Time: For each accusation, pinpoint the exact date and time it allegedly occurred.
- Location: Identify the precise location of each alleged incident.
- Witnesses Mentioned: Note any individuals the plaintiff claims witnessed the event.
Step 2: Build Your Counter-Narrative and Timeline
- Your Whereabouts: For each alleged incident, document where you were and what you were doing. Be as specific as possible.
- Your Witnesses (Alibi): Identify anyone who was with you or can verify your location and activities at the time of the alleged incident. Gather their full names and contact information.
- Context is Key: For each allegation, provide the broader context. What led up to the alleged event? Was there a preceding argument about finances, custody, or another issue? This is not about blaming the plaintiff but providing the full picture for the judge.
Step 3: Evidence Preservation and Collection
This is where we turn your narrative into provable facts. Check off and gather everything you have:
- Text Messages: Save full conversations, not just single messages. Screenshots must include dates and times. Do not delete anything.
- Emails: Print or save complete email chains that provide context or contradict the plaintiff’s claims.
- Voicemails: Preserve any relevant voicemails from the plaintiff or other witnesses.
- Photos/Videos: Gather any photos or videos from your phone or security systems (e.g., Ring doorbell) that can establish a timeline or disprove an allegation.
- Financial Records: Credit card statements or receipts that can place you at a specific location at a specific time.
- Social Media: Check the plaintiff’s social media for posts that might contradict their claims of fear or abuse. Take screenshots immediately.
Step 4: History of the Relationship
The judge will consider the history of your relationship. Be prepared to discuss:
- Prior False Allegations: Has the plaintiff ever made false claims against you or others in the past?
- Control or Motive: Are there ongoing divorce or custody proceedings? Is there a financial motive for the plaintiff to gain leverage by obtaining an FRO?
- Plaintiff’s Conduct: Detail any instances where the plaintiff was the aggressor, was physically violent, or made threats.
By working through this organizer with us, you are not just preparing for a hearing; you are taking control of your case and building the foundation for a robust and compelling defense. Bring this completed guide to our first case assessment.
5. Strategic Defense: How We Fight These Allegations
A successful defense in a New Jersey domestic violence case requires a multi-faceted strategy that goes beyond simple denial. It involves a meticulous deconstruction of the plaintiff’s allegations, challenging their credibility, presenting affirmative evidence, and demonstrating to the court that the legal standards for a Final Restraining Order have not been met.
Over two decades in the trenches of New Jersey’s Family Courts, I’ve learned that a passive defense is a losing defense. We must go on the offensive, not with aggression, but with facts, evidence, and superior legal strategy. Every case is unique, but our approach is built on several key pillars:
- Attacking the Predicate Act: The entire case for a restraining order hinges on the plaintiff proving you committed one of the 19 specific predicate acts. Our first line of attack is often to show that the alleged conduct, even if it occurred, does not legally meet the definition of the offense. For example, a single angry text message may be unpleasant, but it may not rise to the level of “harassment” under N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4, which requires a purpose to harass and a course of conduct. We scrutinize the statutory elements of the alleged crime and argue that the facts simply don’t fit.
- Challenging Credibility Through Cross-Examination: The FRO hearing is often a “he-said, she-said” scenario. The most powerful tool to expose exaggeration, inconsistency, and outright falsehoods is skillful cross-examination. We meticulously prepare to question the plaintiff on the details of their testimony, comparing it to the statements in their TRO application, police reports, and any other communications. Inconsistencies revealed during cross-examination can destroy a plaintiff’s credibility in the eyes of the judge.
- Affirmative Defenses and Counter-Narratives: We don’t just play defense; we build our own case. This can involve:
- Self-Defense: If you used force, was it a reasonable and proportionate response to force used against you? We gather evidence (photos of your injuries, witness testimony) to show you were defending yourself, not acting as an aggressor.
- Presenting an Alibi: Using the evidence gathered with our Case Strategy Organizer, we can place you somewhere else at the time of the alleged incident, making it impossible for you to have committed the act.
- Establishing a Motive to Lie: Is the restraining order being used as a sword instead of a shield? We investigate whether the plaintiff has a motive to fabricate allegations, such as gaining an advantage in a pending divorce, custody battle, or to resolve a financial dispute.
- Arguing the Second Prong: No Need for Protection: Even if the judge believes a minor predicate act occurred, the plaintiff must still prove that a restraining order is necessary for their future protection. This is the second prong of the Silver v. Silver test. We can argue that the incident was an isolated event, a “domestic contretemps” not rising to the level of domestic violence, and that there is no ongoing threat that warrants the issuance of a permanent FRO. We can highlight a history of a non-violent relationship or demonstrate that the plaintiff’s own actions (e.g., continued voluntary contact after the alleged incident) show they are not actually in fear.
This is not an exhaustive list. The right strategy depends on the specific facts of your case. But it illustrates our core philosophy: we dissect the plaintiff’s case, build our own affirmative defense, and hold the plaintiff to their strict burden of proof on every single element required by New Jersey law.
6. Critical Mistakes to Avoid When Accused
When you are suddenly facing a domestic violence charge and a restraining order, the pressure is immense. The actions you take in the first hours and days are critical. Based on my experience, here are the most damaging mistakes a person can make, which can sabotage their own defense before it even begins.
- Violating the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO). This is the cardinal sin and the most common error. The TRO will explicitly state “NO CONTACT.” This means no calls, no texts, no emails, no social media messages, no asking a friend to “just pass along a message.” Any contact, no matter how trivial or well-intentioned, is a violation. It will lead to your immediate arrest and a new criminal charge for Contempt. It also demonstrates to the judge at the FRO hearing that you cannot follow court orders, making it far more likely they will issue a permanent one.
- Trying to “Talk it Out” with the Accuser. You may believe the entire situation is a misunderstanding that can be cleared up with a simple conversation. This is a trap. It is also a direct violation of the TRO. The plaintiff may record your conversation and use your words against you. There is nothing to be gained and everything to be lost by attempting to contact the accuser. Let your attorney do the talking through the proper legal channels.
- Destroying or Deleting Evidence. In a panic, you might be tempted to delete angry text messages, emails, or social media posts. Do not do this. Deleting evidence can be seen as “consciousness of guilt.” Furthermore, those same digital records you delete often contain the full context that could be crucial to your defense. We need to see the entire conversation, not just the parts the plaintiff chooses to show the court. Preserve everything.
- Posting About the Case on Social Media. Venting your frustration on Facebook, Instagram, or any other platform is a catastrophic mistake. Everything you write can and will be used against you. A post complaining about the “crazy” accuser can be framed as harassment. A picture of you out with friends can be used to argue you aren’t taking the matter seriously. Stay completely silent about the case online.
- Failing to Take the TRO Seriously. Many people receive the TRO and think of it as a temporary inconvenience. They fail to immediately seek seasoned legal counsel because they assume they can explain their side of the story to the judge and it will all go away. By the time they realize they are in a formal, complex legal proceeding with devastating potential consequences, precious time to prepare a defense has been lost. You have, at most, 10 days to prepare for a trial that will impact the rest of your life. Treat it with the gravity it deserves from moment one.
- Consenting to a Final Restraining Order. Sometimes, to “make it all go away,” a defendant will agree to the entry of a Final Restraining Order without a hearing. This is almost always a grave error. You are voluntarily accepting all the permanent consequences—the firearms ban, the central registry, the impact on custody and employment—without ever having your day in court. Never consent to an FRO without a thorough case assessment with an experienced attorney.
7. Glossary of Key New Jersey Domestic Violence Terms
- Predicate Act
- One of the 19 specific criminal offenses listed in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-19a that form the basis for a domestic violence complaint. A plaintiff must prove a predicate act occurred to obtain a restraining order. Examples include harassment, assault, terroristic threats, and stalking.
- Temporary Restraining Order (TRO)
- An initial, emergency order granted by a judge based solely on the plaintiff’s allegations (ex parte). It provides immediate protection and sets a date for a final hearing, typically within 10 days.
- Final Restraining Order (FRO)
- A permanent order issued by a Superior Court Judge after a formal hearing where both parties have been heard. An FRO does not expire and has lifelong consequences for the defendant.
- Ex Parte
- A legal proceeding brought by one person in the absence of, and without notification to, the other party. TROs are issued ex parte.
- Plaintiff
- The person who files the domestic violence complaint and seeks the restraining order; the alleged victim.
- Defendant
- The person against whom the domestic violence complaint is filed; the person being accused.
- Contempt (N.J.S.A. 2C:29-9)
- The criminal offense of knowingly violating a court order. Any violation of a TRO or FRO, such as making contact with the plaintiff, results in a charge of contempt.
8. Common Scenarios We Encounter
Scenario 1: The “Heated Argument” Escalation
The Situation: A couple is going through a contentious divorce. An argument over finances escalates, with both parties yelling. One spouse, seeking leverage in the divorce, calls the police and claims the other “threatened” them during the argument. They go to court the next day, obtain a TRO based on the predicate act of “Terroristic Threats,” and the other spouse is suddenly removed from the marital home and cut off from the children.
The Legal Reality: Our job here is to dissect the alleged threat. Was it a genuine threat to commit violence, or was it angry, hyperbolic language used in the heat of an argument? We challenge whether the statement legally meets the definition of a terroristic threat under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3. We also present evidence that the TRO was sought to gain a strategic advantage in the divorce, arguing that this, not fear, is the plaintiff’s true motive.
Scenario 2: The “Harassment by Text” Allegation
The Situation: A couple has recently broken up. One person, feeling hurt and wanting answers, sends a series of text messages and makes multiple phone calls over a 24-hour period. The recipient, who now wants nothing to do with the ex-partner, feels overwhelmed and files for a TRO, alleging “Harassment” and “Stalking.”
The Legal Reality: This is a classic case where we analyze the specific content and context of the communications. While annoying, does the conduct rise to the level of harassment under N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4? This requires proving a “purpose to harass.” We may argue the purpose was to discuss the relationship, not to cause alarm. We also analyze the stalking claim, which requires a repeated course of conduct that would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety. We work to demonstrate that while the communication may have been ill-advised, it was not criminal and does not warrant a permanent FRO.
Scenario 3: The False Allegation After a Night Out
The Situation: A person is served with a TRO alleging they committed “Simple Assault” against their partner the previous night. The defendant has no memory of any physical contact and believes they are being set up. The plaintiff has a minor scratch they claim was caused by the defendant.
The Legal Reality: This is a “he-said, she-said” credibility contest. We immediately use the SRIS Domestic Violence Case Strategy Organizer to build a timeline. We look for evidence. Were they at a bar with friends who saw them leave separately? Are there text messages from the plaintiff after the alleged assault that don’t mention any injury or fear? We would prepare for a rigorous cross-examination of the plaintiff, questioning them on every detail of the alleged assault to find inconsistencies in their story. We would also investigate whether the plaintiff has a history of making false allegations.
9. Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need a lawyer for a Final Restraining Order (FRO) hearing?
While you are not required to have a lawyer, it is profoundly unwise to proceed without one. An FRO hearing is a formal trial with rules of evidence and procedure. The other side can present evidence and cross-examine you. A permanent FRO has devastating lifelong consequences. Representing yourself against a seasoned prosecutor or plaintiff’s attorney is a significant risk. As an attorney with over 20 years of experience in these specific hearings, I can state that having knowledgeable counsel is the single most important factor in your defense.
Can a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) be dropped by the plaintiff?
Yes, a plaintiff can voluntarily request to have the TRO dismissed at any time before the final hearing. They must appear in court and state under oath that they are not being coerced or threatened into making this decision. However, you should never contact the plaintiff to ask them to do this, as that would be a violation of the TRO itself.
What is the difference between a criminal domestic violence charge and a restraining order?
They are two separate legal actions that proceed on parallel tracks. The criminal charge (e.g., assault) is brought by the State of New Jersey in criminal court and can result in jail time, fines, and a criminal record. The restraining order is a civil action brought by the plaintiff in Family Court to get a protective order. You can be found not guilty of the criminal charge but still have a permanent FRO issued against you, or vice-versa. The burden of proof is lower in the FRO hearing (“preponderance of the evidence”) than in the criminal case (“beyond a reasonable doubt”).
Will I go to jail if a Final Restraining Order is issued against me?
The issuance of the FRO itself does not automatically mean jail time. However, if you violate the FRO in any way, you will be arrested for Contempt (a new criminal charge), which can absolutely lead to jail time. A second or subsequent conviction for contempt carries a mandatory minimum jail sentence of 30 days.
How long does a Final Restraining Order last in New Jersey?
It is permanent. It does not expire. The only way to have an FRO removed is for the plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss it later, or for the defendant to file a formal motion with the court and convince a judge that the order is no longer necessary. This is a difficult legal standard to meet.
I was served with a TRO but the allegations are completely false. What should I do?
First, strictly obey every condition of the TRO, especially the no-contact provisions. Second, immediately contact a seasoned domestic violence defense attorney. Third, begin using a framework like our SRIS Domestic Violence Case Strategy Organizer to meticulously document your side of the story and gather any exculpatory evidence (texts, emails, alibi witnesses, etc.). Do not wait.
Can I see my children if a TRO has been issued?
The TRO will specify the terms of temporary custody and parenting time. It may suspend your contact with your children entirely, or it may set up a specific, limited arrangement. If you violate these terms, you are violating the court order. The terms can be addressed and argued over at the final hearing.
The police were called, but I wasn’t arrested. Can the victim still get a restraining order?
Yes. The decision to file for a TRO is separate from the police officer’s decision to make an arrest. An alleged victim can pursue a restraining order even if no criminal charges were filed at the scene.
What if the alleged incident happened a long time ago?
While the timing of the complaint is a factor the judge can consider, there is no strict statute of limitations for filing a restraining order based on a past act of domestic violence. A judge will want to know why the plaintiff waited to file, but it does not automatically bar them from getting a TRO.
I own my house. Can a TRO really force me to leave?
Yes. Absolutely. If a TRO grants the plaintiff exclusive possession of the residence, you must leave immediately. It does not matter if your name is on the deed or the lease. Law enforcement will remove you if necessary. This is one of the most immediate and shocking consequences of a TRO.
What is the standard of proof at an FRO hearing?
The standard is “preponderance of the evidence.” This is a much lower standard than “beyond a reasonable doubt” used in criminal cases. It simply means that the judge must believe that it is more likely than not (a 50.1% probability) that the plaintiff’s claims are true.
If I have a New Jersey FRO against me, is it valid in other states?
Yes. Under federal law, a valid domestic violence restraining order issued in one state is generally enforceable in all other states and jurisdictions.
Can we just agree to a “civil restraint” instead of an FRO?
Sometimes, it is possible to negotiate a “civil restraint” or “Consent Order for Civil Restraints” as an alternative to a final hearing. This is a binding agreement between the parties that sets rules for contact, communication, etc., but it is NOT a Final Restraining Order. It avoids the finding of domestic violence and the devastating consequences of an FRO (like the firearms ban and central registry). This is a complex negotiation that should only be handled by an experienced attorney.
What happens to my guns if a TRO is issued?
Law enforcement will serve you with the TRO and require you to surrender all firearms you own or possess immediately. Your firearms purchaser identification card and any permits to carry will also be suspended. If a FRO is issued, the seizure becomes permanent, and you are barred for life from owning firearms.
The plaintiff is contacting me. Is it still a violation if I reply?
Yes. It is a trap. The TRO prohibits YOU from contacting the plaintiff. It does not prohibit them from contacting you. If they contact you, do not reply. Save the message or record of the call, and provide it to your attorney. Replying is a violation of the order on your part and can lead to your arrest.
If you are facing the dual threat of a New Jersey domestic violence charge and a restraining order, the time to act is now. The legal system moves swiftly, and your rights and future are on the line. At the Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., we bring decades of focused experience to these complex and sensitive cases. We understand the law, the courts, and the strategies required to protect our clients. For a confidential case assessment, call us at 888-437-7747.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice. The law is complex and changes frequently. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this article or contacting our firm. You should consult with a qualified attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.